![]() |
Removing the spindle is straightforward, as described
in detail in this document.
We begin here by removing the bearing caps AFTER REMOVING THE
EXPANDER
SCREWS! There are small bearing "expanders" installed in
slots in the
bearings that are used to spread the bearing slightly so that an oil
passage between the spindle and the bearing is created. In this photo I've removed the pipe plugs, expander screws, and the cap screws that retain the bearing caps. South bend says to use a rod to jar the bearing cap loose, and I agree with them - mine were stuck in place by the factory paint (I think). This photo is showing the rear cap, but the front is exactly the same (although slightly larger). Notice here I've backed off the takeup nut several turns, as instructed in the document I linked to earlier. According to the above document the takeup nut is threaded on to hand-tight, then backed off 3/8" and clamped down. I'm not sure why there's so much clearance. |
| Here I'm showing the condition of the spindle in the area that was under the bearing. There are no score marks or damage of any kind. This is in excellent condition. | ![]() |
![]() |
Here's what the spindle looks like with the pulley cone removed. |
| Here's a shot inside the pulley cone bearings. They look excellent. No visible damage. There's some tiny oxidation spots here and on the spindle, but nothing significant. | ![]() |
| Here's an extreme closeup of the rear sleeve bearing as it was removed from the spindle. Note the scoring in the photo, which can be felt if you run your finger across the bearing. | ![]() |
| It turns out the rear bearing, which I thought was
completely
undamaged, has suffered from someone reassembling the bearing cap with
the expander sitting atop the bearing (rather than in the slot cut in
the bearing). This has the unfortunate effect of placing
indentations in the bearing which precipitate corresponding raised
sections in the slot. I've tried to show one of these raised
areas in this photo. It's difficult to see, as the camera
doesn't
have a very effective macro mode. Suffice to say there were two raised sections in this slot, and two corresponding indentations on the top of the bearing. Much better photography of this situation on another machine may be found here. I used a smooth mill file to gently file away most of these protuberances. |
![]() |
| Note: in
the following text, when I refer to "sides" of the bearing I
mean the parts closest and farthest from the camera in the photos.
The
closer side, which is the side where the operator stands while running
the lathe, will be called the "operator side", while the opposite side
will be called the "far side". Here's the spindle reinstalled, but lacking the bearing caps. For this part you definitely want 2 people and a long dowel rod of some kind placed in the spindle to help carry it. It can be a little tricky to get the oil wick hole on the bottom of each bearing shell to slide onto the oil wick tube. The danger lies in accidentally pressing the oil tube into the casting with the weight of the spindle. The bottom picture here shows my method for reducing the chances of pressing the oil tube in as well as retaining the oil wick during assembly. I used a 3/16" rod through the top oil port, which runs right through the hole in the oil tube I showed on the headstock casting page. Before installing the spindle, you press the wick down and put the rod in to hold it. The rod will also retain the oil tube in case you make a mistake and drop the spindle into the casting. After the spindle is installed you pull the rod out and the wick springs up to contact the spindle. The next step is to install the bearing caps and set the spindle clearance using shims. On the headstock casting page I describe and show pictures of my initial shims, which were 0.015" brass. When I got the lathe it had ~0.0025" clearance (as measured per the South Bend procedure) using ~0.017" shims on both sides of both the front and rear bearing. South bend says to run 0.0007" - 0.001" clearance in the bearings. This is measured by pulling up on the spindle with a force of "approximately 75 lb". It is virtually impossible to be precise with that 75 lb specification - I tried it standing on a bathroom scale and found it extremely difficult to do accurately. I'd prefer to run close to the 0.001" specification to keep the bearings from heating up too much. I'm willing to sacrifice some precision in the lathe in exchange for assured bearing life. With only 0.015" shims the spindle locked. With 0.016" shims on both sides the clearance was something around 0.002" (front and rear). Front bearing. 0.015" on the operator side and 0.016" on the far side gave an indicated clearance of ~0.0012" - 0.0015", depending on how hard I pull up on the spindle. Rear bearing. 0.016" on the operator side and 0.015" on the far side gave an indicated clearance of ~0.001" - 0.0015", again depending on how hard I pull up on the spindle. These clearances are larger than the maximum specification, but my inclination is to leave them alone. As it stands, it seems like there's a lot of drag on the spindle. If I spin it by hand without the chuck in place I get between 1/2 and 3/4 revolution before it stops. With the chuck installed, I get around 3 turns before it stops. More disturbingly, I've noticed the drag decreases for about 1/4 of the rotation, suggesting something is binding up for 3/4 of the rotation. I guess I won't really know anything until I power up the spindle and see if the bearings heat up. |
| It was requested that I show some more detail of the bull
gear itself, with particular attention to the locking mechanism.
The first photo is the back side of the bull gear. The only
part missing in the photo is a thin metal plate that helps retain the
sliding block. The second photo shows an end-view of the pulley cone behind the bull gear. Notice the pockets where the sliding block engages. |
|